Skip to main content

Citations

  • 93 A.D.2d 954
  • 463 N.Y.S.2d 287
  • 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17852

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Defendant’s retention of title and insurance on the car, all with the full knowledge of plaintiff, precludes finding that she was the beneficiary of an unequivocal .gift.... [TJhese vehicles should have been treated in the same fashion as the other property.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Tidball v. Tidball

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.