Skip to main content
· 10/20/2006

TICHANEN v. Harris & Harris, Ltd.

Citations

  • 461 F. Supp. 2d 863
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77237
  • 2006 WL 3365788

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a party raising arbitration as an affirmative defense and then waiting to compel arbitration until after the filing of a second amended complaint did not waive the right to arbitrate
  • estopping signatory plaintiff whose debt had been transferred by signatory creditor to nonsignatory defendant
  • “Motions to compel arbitration are reviewed under a summary judgment standard as set forth in Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 56(c)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.