Skip to main content
· 9/12/2016

Tiburcio v. Capitol of the United States

Citations

  • 672 F. App'x 4

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that FedEx’s authority to operate as a motor carrier was irrelevant in determining whether FedEx actually acted as a motor carrier
  • finding that FedEx was acting as- a shipper under the circumstances
  • finding that FedEx was acting as a shipper under the circumstances
  • “The purpose of requiring such proof of financial responsibility is to ensure that the public is adequately protected from the risks created by a motor carrier’s operations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Srinivasan, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.