· 9/12/2016
Tiburcio v. Capitol of the United States
Citations
- 672 F. App'x 4
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that FedEx’s authority to operate as a motor carrier was irrelevant in determining whether FedEx actually acted as a motor carrier
- finding that FedEx was acting as- a shipper under the circumstances
- finding that FedEx was acting as a shipper under the circumstances
- “The purpose of requiring such proof of financial responsibility is to ensure that the public is adequately protected from the risks created by a motor carrier’s operations.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ginsburg, Srinivasan, Tatel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.