Skip to main content
· 3/7/1974

Tiano v. Elsensohn

Citations

  • 520 P.2d 358
  • 268 Or. 166
  • 1974 Ore. LEXIS 444

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • construing ORS 20.080 ( since amended by Or. Laws 1981, ch. 897, § 1, and Or. Laws 1981, ch. 898, § 19)
  • defendant’s stipulation in prior proceeding was a judicial admission of a specific fact that is binding on him in a subsequent proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.