Tiano, B. v. City of Phila. (WCAB)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that slippery prison floors “do not state even an arguable claim for cruel and unusual punishment”
• holding that keeping a known violent prisoner shackled and handcuffed even when showering was permissible so as to protect staff and fellow inmates
• holding that “[t]he decision by prison officials to curtail LeMaire's outside exercise privileges does not reflect ‘deliberate indifference’\ because the sanction was ‘‘directly linked to [plaintiff’s] own misconduct\
• holding that the food provided to inmates “need not be tasty or aesthetically pleasing,” but it must be “adequate to maintain health”
• holding that slippery prison floors “do not state even an arguable claim for cruel and unusual punishment”
• concluding that use of Nutraloaf diet for seven days did not violate inmate’s Eighth Amendment rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).