Thy Ho v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that robbery and carrying a handgun without a license convictions did not violate double jeopardy principles because the defendant failed to establish that the same evidentiary facts may have been used to prove the elements of each challenged offense
• finding no double jeopardy violation under actual evidence test where defendant was convicted of robbery while armed with a handgun and carrying a handgun without a license
• no violation of the actual evidence test where State cited to different items of property to support robbery and theft convictions
• independent evidence used to establish separate elements allowed for convictions of multiple crimes
• charges of armed robbery and theft Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-2624 | May 23, 2019 Page 15 of 21 did not violate statutory elements test; the offenses as charged involved different victims and different types of property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).