Thut v. Grant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Legislature may retroactively eliminate certain procedural requirements in paternity suits
• holding that putative father did not have a vested right in procedural rules previously applicable to paternity suits, even though application of those rules would have been “fatal to the attempted prosecution of complainant’s case”
• promulgation of new rules governing procedure in filiation action held applicable to cause of action accruing prior to effective date of revision
• promulgation of new rules governing procedure in filiation action held applicable to cause of action accruing prior to effective date of revision
• “It is irmly established that there is no vested right in any particular mode of procedure or remedy, and it is a general rule that, where a statute giving a particular remedy is unquali iedly repealed, the 87 remedy is gone.” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).