Thurza Strag v. Board of Trustees, Craven Community College Craven Community College, (Two Cases)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff must put forth evidence to rebut the defendant's initial evidence showing a gender neu- tral reason for the pay differential
• holding that experience, reputation, and popularity are gender-neutral justifications sufficient to defeat an unequal pay claim
• finding that the Biology and Mathematics departments required instructors to have different skills and responsibilities
• stating that when the defendant brings forth sufficient evidence of its affirmative defense under the Equal Pay Act, the plaintiff must rebut the evidence in order to prevail
• stating that when the defendant brings forth sufficient evidence of its affirmative defense under the Equal Pay Act, the plaintiff must rebut the evidence in order to prevail
• stating that denial of a discovery motion does not constitute reversible error where the information sought could not be used to defeat summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).