Thurston v. American Stevedores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no good cause where “the substance of the defendants ‘new’ claim was known when the defendants filed their original amended answer”
• finding a lack of diligence where “the substance of the defendants' ‘new’ claim was known when the defendants filed their original amended answer and added their counterclaim”
• denying motion to amend where the motion was filed “four months, a substantial amount of time, after the deadline in the Scheduling Order [had] passed” and it was “time for [the] case to move forward”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).