Thunelius v. Posacki
Citations
- 193 Conn. App. 666
Syllabus
The defendant mother appealed to this court from the judgment of the trial court awarding the plaintiff father sole legal and primary physical custody of the parties' minor child and issuing certain orders. The plain- tiff had filed an application seeking sole custody of the child, who had been living with the defendant since his birth. The plaintiff also filed motions for pendente lite orders to establish a parenting plan, to appoint a guardian ad litem for the child and for child support. Thereafter, the trial court issued a pendente lite order appointing H as guardian ad litem for the child and accepted the parties' stipulation regarding pendente lite financial orders. Subsequently, the defendant filed a motion seeking to hold the plaintiff in contempt for violating the pendente lite financial orders, and the plaintiff filed a motion to modify his support obligations under the financial orders, claiming a substantial change in circum- stances. Following a hearing on the plaintiff's application for custody, the trial court found that the plaintiff had rebutted the presumption of joint legal custody and ordered that the plaintiff have sole legal and primary physical custody of the child, with parenting time for the defen- dant, and that the defendant pay the plaintiff $241 in weekly child support in accordance with the Connecticut child support guidelines. The court also issued a protective order pending any potential appeal to secure the custody award in order to provide a smooth as possible transition for the child. In addition, the court issued orders related to, inter alia, the child's education and associated costs, and ordered that H continue to serve as the child's guardian ad litem and issued various orders related thereto. The court also granted the plaintiff's motion to modify and ordered that the plaintiff's child support obligation would terminate on the date when the defendant's child support obligation began. The court, however, did not rule on the de
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- subsequent orders addressing appointment of guardian ad litem for child superseded order challenged on appeal, rendering portion of appeal moot
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lavine; Keller; Bishop
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- J. Y. v. M. R.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2022-10-11· cited 9×
- Dempsey v. CappuccinoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2020-10-06· cited 2×
- Zakko v. KasirConnecticut Appellate Court· 2022-01-04· cited 2×
- Lehane v. MurrayConnecticut Appellate Court· 2022-09-20· cited 2×
- D. S. v. D. S.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2023-02-07· cited 2×
- R. H. v. M. H.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-08-14· cited 1×
- In re Jewelyette M.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-03-21· cited 1×
- Christensen v. ChristensenConnecticut Appellate Court· 2025-04-29· cited 1×
- In re Probate Appeal of TunickConnecticut Appellate Court· 2022-10-04
- Speer v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2026-06-02
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- O'Neill v. O'NeillConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-01-26· cited 189×
- Yontef v. YontefSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-08-11· cited 145×
- Doe v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-07-31· cited 48×
- ACMAT Corp. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-05-29· cited 39×
- Masters v. MastersSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-12· cited 39×
- Garrison v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-05-24· cited 36×
- Zilkha v. ZilkhaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-05-09· cited 26×
- Wasson v. WassonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-08-30· cited 21×
- Kennedy v. KennedyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-08-05· cited 12×
- Fennelly v. NortonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-01-19· cited 11×
- Kyle S. v. Jayne K.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2018-06-05· cited 11×
- Carroll v. CarrollConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-09-21· cited 8×
- Lamacchia v. ChilinskyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-09-09· cited 8×
- Brown v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-11-08· cited 8×
- Parrotta v. ParrottaConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-02-23· cited 7×
- Santos v. MorrisseyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-03-29· cited 5×
- Bento v. BentoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-11-30· cited 3×
- Carpenter v. MontanaroConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-02-23· cited 3×
- Lane v. LaneConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-08-24· cited 2×
- Larson v. LarsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-09-25· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.