Threzzy v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that one cannot patent the “art of cutting ice by means of any power, other than human power,” because it was “a claim for an art or principle in the abstract, and not for any particular method or machinery, by which ice can be cut”
• finding ineligible a claim to “the art of cutting ice by means of any power, other than human power”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).