Threet v. Barnhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding appellate argument insufficiently developed; declining to speculate on what evidence appellant claimed was ignored
• stating that when the Appeals Council denies further review, the ALJ’s decision is deemed the final decision of the Commissioner
• defining materiality as the evidence possessing “a reasonable possibility that it would have changed the outcome”
• defining materiality as the evidence possessing “a reasonable possibility that it would have changed the outcome”
• finding evidence material if there is a reasonable possibility that it would have changed the outcome
• noting evidence can be deemed new if it was not available when the ALJ 24 issued the decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).