Threesome Entertainment v. Strittmather

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that not all nude dancing constitutes protected speech, but assuming that the nude dancing at issue received First Amendment protection
• holding that the operator of cabaret satisfied the irreparable harm standard when the ordinance prohibited his ability to convey artistic and erotic message through the erotic dancers who worked at the cabaret
• asserting that municipal legislators need not review such studies themselves “so long as they receive recommendations from knowledgeable persons”
• recognizing “legitimate governmental interest of preventing minors from entering an adult cabaret”
• proceeding under assumption that the nude dancing at issue sought to communicate \an endorsement of erotic experience\
• pro-ceeding under assumption that the nude dancing at issue sought to communicate “an endorsement of erotic experience”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).