Three Seas Corp. v. FFE TRANSP. SERVICES

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party's argument that \a simple unexplained denial to the allegation that venue was proper\ was sufficient under rule 1.140(b) was \without merit\
• holding that the defense of improper venue based on a contractual forum selection clause is waived if not pled with particularity in responsive pleading or, if made by motion, \before pleading if a further pleading is permitted\
• rejecting a party's argument that rule 1.140(b)'s particularity requirement does not apply where a defense appears on the face of the pleadings because \[r]ule 1.140(b) contains no such exception. The defendant must follow the terms of the rule.\
• Texas forum selection clause waived by failure to raise in defensive motion or answer, though contract containing selection clause an exhibit to complaint
• Texas forum selection clause waived by failure to raise in defensive motion or answer, though contract containing selection clause an exhibit to complaint
• finding the affirmative defense of improper venue waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).