Three Rivers Motors Company v. The Ford Motor Company and Auto Lite Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although ordinarily words of release will not be construed to bar unknown claim, parties intended to release accrued but unknown antitrust claims
• holding that although ordinarily words of release will not be construed to bar unknown claim, parties intended to release accrued but unknown antitrust claims
• holding that parties may not waive liability for future antitrust violations
• holding that former Hl. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Defendant USAA General Indemnity Company’s Motion for Leave to Supplement Affirmative Defenses and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment will be denied. An appropriate Order follows. BY THE COURT: “4 ae gf JL
• applying state law to interpret releases of antitrust claims does not contravene federal policy
• setting out Pennsylvania law on releases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).