Three Registered Voters v. Board of Selectmen of Lynnfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding exclusion of expert’s warning opinions where opinions were unsupported by “research, data or scientific theories”
• “Because the adequacy of warnings in products liability cases tend to implicate the study of human factors and other industry standards, this court agrees that expert testimony is perhaps the most appropriate form of evidence.”
• standard of review for § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) dismissal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).