Three Flint Hill Ltd. Partnership v. Prudential Insurance (In Re Three Flint Hill Ltd. Partnership)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that while control is certainly probative of an insider relationship, it is not required for finding insider status
• finding that while control is certainly probative of an insider relationship, it is not required for finding insider status
• finding that while control is certainly probative of an insider relationship, it is not required for finding insider status
• noting that “control is not dispositive” and focusing more broadly on the closeness of the relationship between the parties and on whether the parties’ transactions were made at arm’s length
• “Courts generally hold, in accordance with the legislative history of Section 101(31
• “Courts generally hold ... that [non-statutory] insider status is determined by a factual inquiry into the closeness of the relationship between the parties and whether the transaction between the transferee and [the] debtor was conducted at ‘arm’s length.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).