Three Affiliated Tribes v. Wold Engineering, P. C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing the general rule from Deavers when evaluating the second and third factors from Raschke
• treating movant's motion for new trial as a motion for habeas relief under K.S.A. 60-1507
• stating there are four factors to consider in determining whether the Legislature's use of \shall\ makes a statutory provision mandatory or directory
• finding dismissal of K.S.A. 60-1507 motion was proper due to its untimely filing, so no need to address district court's additional holding that motion was successive
• noting the panel considering Holt's second K.S.A. 60-1507 motion found Holt's jury bias claim \could have been raised on direct appeal or in his first 60- 1507 motion\
• articulating four factors to determine whether “shall” makes particular statutory provision mandatory or directory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).