· 6/18/1986
Thrall Car Manufacturing Co. v. Lindquist
Citations
- 495 N.E.2d 1132
- 145 Ill. App. 3d 712
- 99 Ill. Dec. 397
- 1986 Ill. App. LEXIS 2529
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[a] reviewing court is entitled to have the issues on appeal clearly defined with pertinent authority cited and a cohesive legal argument presented. The appellate court is not a depository in which the appellant may dump the burden of argument and research.”
- stating that “A reviewing court is entitled to have the issues on appeal clearly defined with pertinent authority cited and a cohesive legal argument presented. The appellate court is not a depository in which the appellant may dump the burden of argument and research.”
- “A reviewing court is entitled to have the issues on appeal clearly defined with pertinent authority cited and a cohesive legal argument presented.”
- “The appellate court is not a depository in which the appellant may dump the burden of argument and research.”
- “The appellate court is not a depository in which the appellant may dump the burden of argument and research.”
- “The appellate court is not a depository in which the appellant may dump the burden of argument and research”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McGILLICUDDY
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.