Thorpe v. ZIMMER, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Second Circuit has interpreted 28 U.S.C. § 455 to require recusal if ‘an objective, disinterested observer fully informed of the underlying facts, [would] entertain significant doubt that justice would be done absent recusal.’” (citing Yousef, 327 F.3d at 169)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).