Thorpe v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describes double jeopardy cases as decided “coterminously” or “conjointly” under the Indiana and federal constitutions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Valentin v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-04· cited 26×
• Moore v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1998-02-06· cited 13×
• Richardson v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1997-11-07· cited 8×
• Thorpe v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-22· cited 1×
• Valentin v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1998-12-04

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Dixon
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 2,221×
• Games v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-23· cited 117×
• Flowers v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1985-08-02· cited 71×
• Bevill v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1985-01-10· cited 67×
• Buie v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1994-04-11· cited 62×
• Grinstead v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1997-07-22· cited 57×
• Gregory-Bey v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1996-07-19· cited 32×
• Channell v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1995-11-30· cited 24×
• Chiesi v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1994-12-14· cited 14×
• Neal v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1995-12-21· cited 12×
• Valentin v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1997-09-25· cited 9×
• England v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1993-12-16· cited 5×