Michigan Court of Appeals· 10/23/2007
Thornton v. Thornton
Citations
- 277 Mich. App. 453
- 746 N.W.2d 627
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendant’s 2005 motion to amend a QDRO entered in 1993 was untimely and unreasonable to the extent that it could be interpreted as a motion for relief from the judgment under MCR 2.612
- holding the provisions of the contemporaneous QDRO must be treated as part of the settlement because the parties approved the content of the judgment of divorce at the same time they approved the initial QDRO referred to by the judgment of divorce
- holding the provisions of the contemporaneous QDRO must be treated as part of the settlement because the parties approved the content of the judgment of divorce at the same time they approved the initial QDRO referred to by the judgment of divorce
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fer, Murphy, Schuette, Smolensk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Neville v. NevilleMichigan Court of Appeals· 2012-02-16· cited 47×
- Pruitt v. PruittCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2008-12-01· cited 33×
- Stiel v. StielCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2011-03-16· cited 9×
- Thornton v. ThorntonMichigan Court of Appeals· 2008-01-03· cited 3×
- Robert L. Macy v. Quida J. MacyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2014-02-11
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gates v. GatesMichigan Court of Appeals· 2003-07-01· cited 135×
- Clark v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals· 2005-12-08· cited 68×
- Moore v. MooreMichigan Court of Appeals· 2000-12-08· cited 64×
- Roth v. RothMichigan Court of Appeals· 1993-09-20· cited 19×
- In Re Estate of LobainaMichigan Court of Appeals· 2005-10-13· cited 17×
- Rapaport v. RapaportMichigan Court of Appeals· 1987-03-06· cited 16×
- Quade v. QuadeMichigan Court of Appeals· 1999-10-19· cited 16×
- Quade v. QuadeMichigan Court of Appeals· 2000-01-25· cited 5×
- Bailey v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court· 1958-04-14· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.