Thornton v. Hemphill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming on direct appeal a stalking protective order entered under OCGA § 16-5-94
• “A party cannot reap the benefit of any error caused or aided by his own trial tactics, procedure or conduct.”
• “[T]he trial court has wide discretion to admit testimony of questionable relevance.” (punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).