Skip to main content
· 5/15/1953

Thornton v. Budge

Citations

  • 257 P.2d 238
  • 74 Idaho 103
  • 1953 Ida. LEXIS 258

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • if the existence or nonexistence of agency is a disputed question of fact it was for the jury to decide
  • “If it be thought that there was no conflict in the evidence, then it was the duty of the court to instruct the jury that the relationship was that of principal and agent. If the existence or non-existence of agency was a disputed question of fact it was for the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Porter, Givens, Taylor, Thomas, Keeton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.