Thorne v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that there is no prohibition against using the same aggravating factor to both enhance a sentence and impose consecutive terms

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Allen v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-01-19· cited 40×
• Catellier v. Depco, Inc.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1998-06-17· cited 20×
• Chavez v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-02-10· cited 15×
• Haggard v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-07-09· cited 15×
• Heinzman v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2012-06-27· cited 12×
• Winters v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-04-27· cited 7×
• Cory Heinzman v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2012-06-27

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bish v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1981-06-10· cited 63×
• Stewart v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1988-12-16· cited 60×
• Metzler v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1989-07-07· cited 53×
• Parrish v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1987-11-24· cited 44×
• Tyra v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1987-05-07· cited 33×
• Smith v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1995-08-31· cited 27×
• Woods v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1997-03-06· cited 27×
• Ridenour v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-08-15· cited 24×
• Warren v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1984-11-19· cited 22×
• Idle v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1992-03-05· cited 21×
• Staton v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-09-28· cited 19×
• Moore v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1991-04-10· cited 16×