Thornbury Twp, Pet v. West Chester Utd Soccer Club

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a review of an employee’s 1989 performance was irrelevant to a determination of whether his performance was satisfactory at the time of his termination in August of 1990
• holding that a positive review in January was irrelevant to the determination of whether the employee was performing adequately when terminated in August
• holding that the following remarks did not constitute direct evidence of age discrimination: “[i]ts about time we get some young blood in this company”; “[plaintiff], you are too damn old for this kind of work”; and “[plaintiff, you are just] too old [to play golf]”
• “Discriminatory remarks about age, therefore, cannot be stray or isolated statements.”
• Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”)
• stating two schemes of proof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).