Thorkildsen v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that in the obscenity context, this fact did not shed light on whether the drafter’s intended more protection in the obscenity context
• holding that state constitution does not offer broader protection to nude or sexually explicit dancing
• holding the Washington Constitution provides no more protection than the United States Constitution in the context of the interest in confidentiality, or the nondisclosure of personal information
• stating that \licensing requirements advance several legitimate goals\ such as protecting minors, assuring correct identification of dancers, and enabling effective law enforcement
• holding the Washington Constitution provides no more protection than the United States Constitution in the context of the interest in confidentiality, or the nondisclosure of personal information
• holding 14-day waiting period for managers violated Washington constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).