Thorkelson v. NY Pizza & Pasta Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming application of paragraph 440.15(4)(e) with evidence of termination for misconduct because “[c]learly a claimant is not disqualified from workers’ compensation benefits just because she ‘was terminated ... for cause’ ”
• “‘Whether a claimant commits misconduct connected with work is a question of law, [but the] findings of fact [on which the legal question is based] must be accepted if supported by competent, substantial evidence.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).