Skip to main content
· 10/30/1996

Thoreson v. Shaffer

Citations

  • 683 A.2d 1153
  • 111 Md. App. 689
  • 1996 Md. App. LEXIS 134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the SMLL “is intended as a penalty against the violator as opposed to a benefit for the borrower”
  • lender who unknowingly violated the provisions of the SMLL was not entitled to collect from the borrower any interest, costs, or other charges with respect to the loan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fischer, Davis, Bishop

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.