Skip to main content

Thompson v. White

Citations

  • 76 Cal. 381
  • 18 P. 399
  • 1888 Cal. LEXIS 895

Syllabus

<p>Question as to the Sufficiency of the Evidence, how Presented. —If no motion for new trial is made, and the appeal from the judgment is not taken within sixty days from its rendition, the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the decision cannot he considered.</p> <p>Interlocutory Decree in Actions Other than Partition—Inconsistency between Interlocutory and Final Decree.—The interlocutory decree referred to in Thompson v. White, 63 Cal. 505, is the interlocutory decree known to the old equity practice. It is not conclusive, like an interlocutory decree in partition, but may be modified by the final decree.</p>

Judges: Hayne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.