Skip to main content
· 2/17/2017

Thompson v. Wardley Co.

Citations

  • 390 P.3d 723
  • 382 P.3d 682

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that documents describing the work performed by each employee, identifying the number of hours worked, and outlining the burdened hourly rates of each employee are the types of information used to quantify the bid proposal and submission costs
  • holding FAR provisions concerning bid preparation and proposal costs were “useful guidance” but “not authoritative”
  • expressing a minority view that FAR provisions do not define bid preparation and proposals costs that may be awarded by this court
  • awarding bid proposal costs where re-evaluation of proposals was not practical
  • “A reevaluation restores to a victim of arbitrary and capricious procurement activity its substantial chance to receive the contract award.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.