Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2/5/1988
Thompson v. Thompson
Citations
- 749 S.W.2d 468
- 1988 Tenn. App. LEXIS 73
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that an essential element in a dog bite claim is that plaintiffs “must prove that the defendants knew or should have known about the dog’s dangerous propensities.”
- third element that a dog bite claimant must prove is “that the defendants knew or should have known about the dog’s dangerous propensities”
- “[E]vidence of subsequent remedial measures becomes relevant only when the defendant has raised the issue of control and ownership.” (citing E. CLEARY, MCCORMICK’S HANDBOOK ON THE LAW OF EVIDENCE § 275, at 817 (3d ed. 1984)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cantrell, Koch, Todd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rothstein v. Orange Grove Center, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court· 2001-11-29· cited 23×
- Bernice Rothstein v. Orange Grove Center, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court· 2001-11-29
- Howard v. NorwoodCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2000-05-25
- William M. Woodside, and Billy E. and Mary Agnita Woodside v. Susan E. Woodside (Gilley) - ConcurringCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1995-10-20
- James Anthony Moore v. Michael GautCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2015-12-30
- Corey M. Searcy v. Walter AxleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2017-10-19
- State of Tennessee v. Derrick Jerome MillerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2020-02-03
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Electric Power Board of Chattanooga v. St. Joseph Valley Structural Steel Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court· 1985-05-06· cited 95×
- State v. BennettTennessee Supreme Court· 1977-04-25· cited 59×
- Alex v. ArmstrongTennessee Supreme Court· 1964-12-11· cited 48×
- Harper v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1983-12-09· cited 44×
- Crowe v. ProvostCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1963-05-17· cited 32×
- Baxter v. VandenheovelCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1984-12-06· cited 20×
- Ehrlich v. WeberTennessee Supreme Court· 1905-04-15· cited 19×
- Clark v. BringsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1969-06-27· cited 16×
- Lassetter v. HensonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1979-07-06· cited 14×
- Painter v. Toyo Kogyo of JapanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1984-10-18· cited 14×
- Belote Ex Rel. Parker v. Memphis Development Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1962-12-17· cited 9×
- Railroad v. WyattTennessee Supreme Court· 1900-04-18· cited 9×
- Meegal v. Memphis Street Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 1950-01-06· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.