Thompson v. Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• pension benefits not too uncertain or speculative to be considered property subject to distribution
• pension benefits not too uncertain or speculative to be considered property subject to distribution
• “The present value of a pension benefit may be arrived at by using generally [sic] actuarial principles to discount for mortality, interest and the probability of the employee remaining with the employer until retirement age.”
• trial court properly considered plaintiff’s unaccrued pension benefits as source of future income when fixing prop- erty assignment and alimony orders
• the value of unaccrued benefits ascertainable by resort to actuarial tables and not too speculative for division at dissolution
• “The present value of a pension benefit may be arrived at by using general ] actuarial principles to discount for mortality, interest and the probability of the employee remaining with the employer until retirement age.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• In Re the Marriage of Sullins
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2006-05-12· cited 334×
• Krafick v. Krafick
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-08-08· cited 162×
• Rubin v. Rubin
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-06-30· cited 139×
• Bender v. Bender
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-12-18· cited 93×
• Swenson v. Sawoska
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-05-22· cited 74×
• In Re the Marriage of Brown
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2009-12-18· cited 72×
• Grode v. Grode
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 64×
• Broadhead v. Broadhead
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1987-05-12· cited 61×
• Mickey v. Mickey
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-07-21· cited 56×
• Bartlett v. Bartlett
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-11-12· cited 48×
• Oakes v. New England Dairies, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-05-28· cited 40×
• Axtell v. Axtell
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-10-24· cited 21×
• Askinazi v. Askinazi
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1994-05-10· cited 17×
• Sousa v. Sousa
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2017-06-13· cited 16×
• Martin v. Martin
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-05-08· cited 13×
• Kent v. DiPaola
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2017-12-05· cited 13×
• Schwab v. Schwab
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2008-04-07· cited 7×
• Hawkins v. Hawkins
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1987-06-09· cited 7×
• Cunningham v. Cunningham
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-02-12· cited 7×
• Rubin v. Rubin
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1986-06-17· cited 5×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Marriage of Brown
  California Supreme Court· 1976-01-16· cited 507×
• Krause v. Krause
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-03-07· cited 60×
• Ruick v. Twarkins
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1976-06-01· cited 42×
• Cleveland v. Cleveland
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-06-05· cited 33×
• DECOSSY v. DeCossy
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-01-04· cited 27×
• Bansak v. Pawelczyk
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-09-27· cited 16×