Thompson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding 911 calls can be admitted “as either a spontaneous statement pursuant to section 90.803(1) . . . or an excited utterance pursuant to section 90.803(2), [Florida Statutes (2022)]”
• holding 911 calls were admissible 8 as either spontaneous statement or excited utterance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Armando Lazaro Cordovi v. The State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-04-03
• Pierce Nelson Hoempler v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-03-26

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Canakaris v. Canakaris
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
• Hudson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2008-09-25· cited 110×
• Henyard v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-12-19· cited 101×
• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-10-18· cited 100×
• Deparvine v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2008-09-29· cited 95×
• Hutchinson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-07-01· cited 78×
• Tucker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-23· cited 16×
• Nolte v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-12-02· cited 12×
• J.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-01-05· cited 9×