Thompson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because a witness could .have been a principal in the State’s case, he was an accomplice as a matter of law
• “[a] failure to instruct on the law of accomplice witnesses, especially where no charge was requested, is not reversible error where the evidence clearly warrants a conviction independent of the accomplice’s testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Solis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-06-27· cited 221×
• Duran v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-02-27· cited 59×
• Ash v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2017-06-28· cited 35×
• Deal v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-04-24· cited 16×
• Nelson v. Planned Parenthood Center of Tucson, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-01-30· cited 7×
• Thompson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-05-01· cited 1×
• Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company v. Freddie Lee, Sr.
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2000-02-07
• State of Tennessee v. Noah Hamilton
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2001-05-18
• Samuel Jones v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2013-08-14