District Court of Appeal of Florida· 12/22/2004
Thompson v. State
Citations
- 890 So. 2d 382
- 2004 WL 2953312
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an officer's testimony that a third party informed him that the appellant failed to complete a treatment program was hearsay and could not be a basis for revocation of probation
- explaining that although hearsay evidence is admissible at revocation hearing, defendant's probation or community control cannot be revoked solely on basis of hearsay
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Northcutt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Stewart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-14· cited 14×
- Smith-Curles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-12-22· cited 5×
- Lanier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-18· cited 5×
- Gauthier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-02-23· cited 5×
- Dawson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-22· cited 2×
- Scott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-04-15
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.