Thompson v. Southern California Motor Road Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the second prong of the test supported asportation because the crimes occurred before and after the movement of the victim, but not during her movement
• explaining that the second prong of the test supported asportation because the crimes occurred before and after the movement of the victim, but not during her movement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).