Skip to main content
· 6/22/2011

Thompson v. Retirement Plan for Employees of S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.

Citations

  • 651 F.3d 600
  • 51 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2852
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 12607
  • 2011 WL 2463550

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that receipt of lump-sum distribution served as an “unequivocal repudiation of any entitlement to benefits beyond the account balance” because it was clear that “no additional benefits would be forthcoming”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Kanne, Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.