Thompson v. Lee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• an opposition to a motion to confirm serves the same purposes as a motion to vacate, and so, a nonmoving party is entitled to file an opposition, so long as the 90-day time period has not elapsed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-08-21· cited 110×
• Haynes v. Kuder
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-05-31· cited 42×
• Hercules & Co. v. Beltway Carpet Service, Inc.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-06-21· cited 31×
• Casey v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2012-12-13· cited 23×
• Shaff v. Skahill
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-12-11· cited 15×
• Pisciotta v. Shearson Lehman Bros., Inc.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-08-05· cited 11×
• Washington Teachers' Union Local 6 v. District of Columbia Public Schools
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-10-10· cited 5×
• In the Matter of: Jon Amberson
  Fifth Circuit· 2022-11-18· cited 3×
• Sanders v. Maple Springs Baptist Church
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-12-13· cited 1×

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• James W. Bonar and Beverly J. Bonar v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., John S. Mc Nally, Jr., Ed Leavenworth
  Eleventh Circuit· 1988-01-22· cited 169×
• Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-11-13· cited 164×
• Kentucky River Mills v. Jackson
  Sixth Circuit· 1953-06-17· cited 70×
• Stockton Combine Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glen's Falls Co.
  California Supreme Court· 1893-06-09· cited 62×
• Brandon v. Hines
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-12-21· cited 46×
• Grudem Brothers Co. v. Great Western Piping Corp.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1973-09-21· cited 39×
• Los Angeles County Pioneer Society v. Historical Society
  Supreme Court· 1953-11-16· cited 37×
• Bloom v. Landy
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-04-26· cited 33×
• Hollywood Credit Clothing Co. v. Gibson
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1963-03-01· cited 26×
• Security Construction Co. v. Maietta
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-03-18· cited 25×
• Amalgamated Ass'n of Street Electric Railway v. Connecticut Co.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1955-03-07· cited 24×
• Jaffe v. Nocera
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-06-06· cited 18×
• Sheahan v. School Committee of Worcester
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1971-06-22· cited 16×
• Crosby-Ironton Federation of Teachers, Local 1325 v. Independent School District No. 182
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-10-12· cited 15×
• Coles v. Redskin Realty Co.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1962-10-26· cited 11×
• Joder Building Corp. v. Lewis
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-11-09· cited 11×
• Greene v. Gibraltar Mortgage Investment Corp.
  District of Columbia· 1980-02-29· cited 10×
• Best Coin-Op, Inc. v. Clementi
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-12-27· cited 9×
• Walter A. Brown, Inc. v. Moylan
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-05-15· cited 7×