Skip to main content

Thompson v. Lane

Citations

  • 551 N.E.2d 731
  • 194 Ill. App. 3d 855
  • 141 Ill. Dec. 544
  • 1990 Ill. App. LEXIS 221

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \a statement of reasons should be sufficient to enable a reviewing body to determine whether [punishment has been imposed] for an impermissible reason or for no reason at all\
  • holding that although detailed factual findings are not required, “mere conclusory statements” are insufficient
  • affirming the trial court's order issuing a writ of mandamus to compel DOC to conduct rehearing of inmates' disciplinary reports consistent with due process or in the alternative to restore plaintiff's lost good-time credits and demotion in grade
  • affirming the trial court’s order issuing a writ of mandamus to compel DOC to conduct rehearing of inmates’ disciplinary reports consistent with due process or in the alternative to restore plaintiffs lost good-time credits and demotion in grade
  • affirming the trial court’s order issuing a writ of mandamus to compel DOC to conduct rehearing of inmates’ disciplinary reports consistent with due process or, in the alternative, to restore plaintiffs’ lost good-time credits and demotion in grade
  • affirming the trial court's order issuing a writ of mandamus to compel DOC to conduct rehearing of inmates' disciplinary reports consistent with due process or in the alternative to restore plaintiff's lost good-time credits and demotion in grade

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steigmann, McCullough, Spitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.