Thompson v. Kohl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that employer’s oral agreement to transfer stock to employee was not “sale” of securities for statute of frauds purposes because employee did not pay for stock in currency, but in services rendered
• applying a provision of the Delaware Code similar to § 7-8-102
• applying Georgia's version of § 7-8-102, which is similar to Alabama's
• Statute of Frauds did not bar enforcement of oral agreement by an employer to transfer corporate stock to an employee for a nonmonetary consideration, such an agreement not being a “sale” within the meaning of the Statute of Frauds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).