Thompson v. James G. McCarrick Co., Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• claim requirement satisfied when written documents “supplied sufficient information upon which a prompt and complete investigation [could] be based” (internal quotation omitted)
• the writing requirement had been satisfied when the claimant sent the carrier a “statement of protest,” which specified the damaged shipments, indicated that payment would be disputed, and gave an estimate of damages
• “There is no requirement that ... [the] exact amount of damage be stated....”
• the writing requirement had been satisfied when the claimant sent the carrier a “statement of protest,” which specified the damaged shipments, indicated that payment would be disputed, and gave an estimate of damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).