Skip to main content
· 10/15/1889

Thompson v. Ish

Citations

  • 99 Mo. 160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellant’s claim that trial court erred by applying wrong standard of review in its order was not preserved because appellant failed to raise issue in a motion for reconsideration
  • holding that appellant failed to preserve issue that she could not have been expected to raise until the trial court issued its order because she failed to raise it in a timely motion for reconsideration
  • holding that appellant’s claim that trial court violated her due process rights by applying wrong standard of review in its order was not preserved because appellant failed to raise issue in a motion for reconsideration
  • explaining that, in order to preserve issue, trial court must have opportunity to consider alleged errors and take remedial action
  • holding that challenge to trial court’s use of a standard in final order that was different from the standard it had earlier announced that it would apply was not preserved because appellant did not raise issue in motion for reconsideration
  • holding any issues that could not have been presented to trial court prior to its decision must be presented to it in motion for reconsideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Babclay, Black, Other, Ray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.