Court of Appeals of Washington· 1/10/1979
Thompson v. Henderson
Citations
- 591 P.2d 784
- 22 Wash. App. 373
- 1979 Wash. App. LEXIS 2075
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The wills’ failure to mention a previous contract implies there was no contract.”
- \The wills' failure to mention a previous contract implies there was no contract.\
- “Where, as here, the trial court determines that a plaintiff has failed to meet the high burden of proof [for showing the existence of an oral contract to devise], it becomes doubly hard for an appellate court to rule in the plaintiff’s favor.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reed
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bentzen v. DemmonsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-01-11· cited 66×
- Bale v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-02-11· cited 55×
- Thor v. McDearmidCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-10-10· cited 47×
- Rabb v. Estate of McDermottCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-01-22· cited 10×
- Garten v. DaleyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-03-22· cited 8×
- Erickson v. KerrCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-05-17· cited 8×
- Hofsvang v. Estate of BrookeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-05-15· cited 5×
- In the Matter of Estate of KrappesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-04-29· cited 5×
- Dennis Bale, / Cross v. Robert E. Fletcher, / CrossCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-02-11
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re Welfare of SegoWashington Supreme Court· 1973-08-30· cited 470×
- Diel v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1972-08-01· cited 38×
- King v. ClodfelterCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1974-03-25· cited 36×
- Robertson v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court· 1912-02-02· cited 34×
- McGugart v. BrumbackWashington Supreme Court· 1969-12-31· cited 33×
- Humphries v. RivelandWashington Supreme Court· 1965-11-18· cited 25×
- Vermette v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1976-11-30· cited 25×
- Boettcher v. BusseWashington Supreme Court· 1954-11-26· cited 24×
- Worden v. WordenWashington Supreme Court· 1917-06-06· cited 22×
- Cook v. CookWashington Supreme Court· 1972-05-25· cited 20×
- Bicknell v. GuentherWashington Supreme Court· 1965-02-25· cited 15×
- Mood v. BancheroWashington Supreme Court· 1966-01-20· cited 14×
- Arnold v. BeckmanWashington Supreme Court· 1968-11-15· cited 11×
- In Re Estate of RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1974-08-01· cited 11×
- Silhavy v. DoaneWashington Supreme Court· 1957-04-11· cited 9×
- Rolph v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-05-30· cited 9×
- Woeppel v. SimantonWashington Supreme Court· 1958-10-09· cited 5×
- Estes v. EstesWashington Supreme Court· 1956-04-26· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.