Thompson v. Ezor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding contradictions in expert witness testimony are for the jury
• affirming Ezor v. 241 Ga. App. 275, 277-278 (1) (526 SE2d 609) (1999)
• Prophecy rule does not apply to exclude the contradictory testimony of a nonparty expert witness
• Prophecy rule does not apply to exclude the contradictory testimony of a nonparty expert witness
• self-contradictory testimony rule of Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc., 256 Ga. 27 (343 SE2d 680) (1986) “applies only to the testimony of parties to a case, and not to the testimony of witnesses who are not parties”
• self-contradictory testimony rule of Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc., 256 Ga. 27 (343 SE2d 680) (1986) “applies only to the testimony of parties to a case, and not to the testimony of witnesses who are not parties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).