Skip to main content
· 5/18/1953

Thompson v. Dye

Citations

  • 345 U.S. 960

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “and” was disjunctive in the context of a statute that required an employer to pay overtime wages to employees “engaged in the ginning and compressing of cotton”
  • interpreting the phrase \ginning and compressing of cotton” to mean \the performance of either or both”
  • “the word ‘and’ is not a word with a single meaning, for chameleonlike, it takes its color from its surroundings”
  • per curiam opinion denying petition for rehearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.