Thompson v. DeLong
Citations
- 71 Pa. Super. 282
- 1919 Pa. Super. LEXIS 91
Syllabus
<p>Party walls — Expert witnesses — Conflicting testimony — Case for jury.</p> <p>Where expert witnesses differ as to the proper method of locating a line, separating two parcels of real estate, the ease is for the jury and a verdict for the plaintiff will be sustained.</p> <p>Evidence — Admissibility—General objection.</p> <p>If the facts assumed in a question to an expert are incorrect, it is the duty of counsel objecting, to indicate that that was the basis of his objection. In such' case the court is entitled to a distinct statement of the ground on which the objection rests, and in default of such objection the ruling of the court will be sustained on appeal.</p> <p>Appeals — Question not raised in court below.</p> <p>Where no exception was taken to the charge of the court the objection will not be considered, de novo, on appeal.</p>
Judges: Head, Henderson, Kephart, Orlady, Porter, Trexler, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.