Skip to main content
· 6/8/1989

Thompson v. Communications Technology, Inc.

Citations

  • 877 F.2d 27
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 8100

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the parol evidence rule excludes evidence of negotiations that are introduced to vary, add to, or contradict the terms of a valid written instrument.
  • \it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground\
  • “it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground”
  • “it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground”
  • \it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground\
  • “it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canby, Leavy, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.