Skip to main content
· 4/11/2002

Thompson v. City of Vicksburg

Citations

  • 813 So. 2d 717
  • 2002 Miss. LEXIS 137
  • 2002 WL 535907

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Summary judgment was not a final appealable order because trial court did not enter a document styled \Final Judgment.\
  • “Retroactive application is not limited to pending appeals . . . . but also applies to cases awaiting trial.”
  • “[N]ewly enunciated rules of law are applied retroactively to cases that are pending trial or that are on appeal, and not final at the time of the enunciation.”
  • “Newly enunciated rules of law are applied retroactively to cases that are pending trial or that are on appeal, and not final at the time of the enunciation.”
  • “newly enunciated rules of law are applied retroactively to cases that are pending trial or that are on appeal, and not final at the time of the enunciation.”
  • retroactive application of judicially articulated rulings applies to cases awaiting trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: En Banc

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.