Thompson v. Choinski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that habeas claims challenging prison conditions during confinement were mooted by prisoner’s transfer to different penitentiary
• holding that because the petitioner had “since been transferred . . . [his] claims [were] therefore moot”
• holding that habeas claims challenging prison conditions during confinement were mooted by prisoner's transfer to different penitentiary
• holding that where petitioner “has since been transferred from the Connecticut facility to the United States Penitentiary at Lewisburg . . . [his] claims [as to his conditions of confinement while incarcerated] are . . . moot.”
• holding that where petitioner \has since been transferred from the Connecticut facility to the United States Penitentiary at Lewisburg . . . [his] claims [as to his conditions of confinement while incarcerated] are . . . moot.\
• explaining that the Second Circuit has \long interpreted § 2241 as applying to challenges to the execution of a federal sentence including such matters as . . . prison conditions\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).